I’m with Woodman on this. People think that it’s harder for a man to be raped because men have to have an erection to have sex. Well, guess what, an erection isn’t a voluntary response.
The only parallel here would be a woman having an orgasm during rape. Think of how that would mess with her mind (I just had to discard three figures of speech to avoid nasty puns).
There were two stories (with variations) going around in the early 80s that may have been urban legends. However, even if they were urban legends, you have to admit that it is possible to do the same thing.
Story #1
Three women enticed a man into their apartment and knocked him out. When he woke up, he was tied spread-eagle to the bed, naked. For three days, the women took turns keeping him erect, without an orgasm. When he was finally released/rescued (stories vary), he was incapable of seeing or hearing a woman without completely freaking out.
Story #2
Two women manage to knock out a man. When he wakes up, he is tied to a pole in the desert sun. The women had taken a length of rawhide, soaked it water, and tied it around his genitals. As the rawhide dried in the sun, it shrank. You can guess what the man’s condition was within a day, other than severe sunburn.
Now, both stories had variations that claimed the men involved had previously raped one of the women. There were also variations on #1 that said this was retribution for dumping (or cheating on) one of the women’s friend, or retaliation for getting a promotion one of the women was trying for.
I heard several variations of #2 that said the man involved was innocent of any wrong-doing; one even said that he was a hitchhiker picked up by the women.
And by the way, date rape drugs, knock-out drops, etc., really don’t care what gender you are.
Now for the really nasty news: a man does not need to have an erection to be anally violated. A man does not need to have an erection to be abused (whips, belts, paddles, clubs, electro, etc.) for the arousal of the perpetrator and/or witnesses. There are lots of people who get sexual gratification from the abuse, denigration, or humiliation of others, without needing to touch them at any time.
I think one of the problems is that, despite common perception, rape is not “having sex with a person against their will”. Rape is “using a person for sexual gratification against their will”. The difference takes into consideration that copulation is not required for sexual gratification.