Movie reviews

I mostly agree with your review. The first half hour or so seemed very rushed because they were building a lot of background.

A few elements from the previous movie got dropped, and there’s a few things that seemed awkward or forced, but overall it’s fun.

Two things I feel I have to mention

First, it suffers from the syndrome common to many current Marvel movies where there’s some exposition to set up the movie that is probably in books and comics or similar.

Second it continues a thread with the Disney era movies that the time scale is very compressed. One thing about A New Hope is it’s unknown how long the movie covers: there’s a clear day/night early on, but it’s unknown if Like is immediately thrown into a cockpit at the end or if there’s a few days while things are being prepared and data crunched to prepare for the final fight. Similarly trips might take hours, days, or weeks and we don’t know. By comparison the sequel trilogy has very set timelines.

Still, I overall enjoyed it.

The clock and the calendar are terrible masters.

1 Like

Ok, so that right there tells me that I need to go see it without the wife. She’s not a SciFi fan anyway - her first question is usually “is it in space?”… if yes, than she’s automatically not interested. Stargate SG-1 got a pass, because they walk everywhere, at lease in the first season, which is all she’s seen.
Thankfully, all the hype I’ve seen has been for Mandilorian, and I have no intention of paying for Disney streaming.

There is a lot of space in this one. It feels a lot like the KotoR games, really, with a lot more jumping from planet to planet (even avoiding an early and somewhat unnecessary “hyperspace skipping” scene) and really reinforcing the stereotype of Star Wars as a setting full of single-biome planets. There’s at least 3-5 major planets (not counting some ‘cameo’ shots) and they kind of jump between them.

I’m letting my wife off the hook for this one, but she is tentatively interested in The Mandalorian because of Baby Yoda and hearing it is overall an interesting plot. We both kind of compromise on accepting that I have my sci-fi/fantasy and she has her period dramas, and we try to share some of the best of them. She liked Rogue One because it was a pretty clearly explained plot with surprisingly few connections to other movies: Base on this, our post-Christmas movie will probably be Knives Out, A Beautiful Day in the Neightborhood or maybe 1917 depending on mood/availability. It looks like I have to go set up a router at her work first, which will at least pay for most of the date night!

Back to TRoS: It’s failing the ‘fridge logic’ test a bit. That’s the idea that if you get up in the middle of the night after watching a movie and go to the fridge to get a snack/drink thinking about it, does it still make sense? Avoiding spoilers, there’s a few elements in this that don’t pass that test, or at least were unnecessary. One comment I heard is it’s like J.J. Abrahms had this huge list of ideas and wanted to put them all in, so didn’t have time to set many of them up.

1 Like

My wife recently discovered the Hallmark/Lifetime holiday romance genre. And it’s horrible. Thankfully, the season for that is winding down.

2 Likes

Mine makes fun of those, but really they’re “guilty pleasures” and if they’re someone’s thing and they enjoy them, I don’t want to make a big deal about it.

My wife’s fondness for period dramas is amusing, and I did get her to watch Black Adder with me (on my nth re-watch).

1 Like

While wife was watching a lot of Hallmark, I was usually playing Fallout with my headset on, but I didn’t say anything to her about it unless it had been on for 8 hours on a Saturday, like for background noise, and I couldn’t take it anymore.

NPR had a group review on some recent Hallmark and Lifetime holiday movies that featured Hanukkah in it. The problem seems to be some of the movies had the stereotype of “I don’t know anything about this other culture’s traditions and I need to do a cram session to learn about it” or were acting in other stupid ways.

Terminator : Dark Fate.

Good storyline, altough retconning is not really my cup of tea though.

Spoiler alert

Retconning means that John Connor dies at the hands of another T800, which disrupts the timeline, so Kyle Reese and the Terminator is not getting sent back in time, the one to save Sarah, the other to kill Sarah (and fails) and leave behind a CPU and arm when it is terminated at the end of T1, which gave rise to Cyberdyne Systems.

So, without the arm and CPU, Cyberdyne Systems is not able to build a CPU prototype, thus Skynet is not born, thus Kyle is not sent back into time etc.

Headache inducing? Not for me.

Anyway, this cuts T3, T4 and T5 as well as Terminator Chronicles neatly out of the timeline.

Gabriel Luna must’ve had some tips from Robert Patrick as his performance as the new Terminator is very good, and closely matches the T1000. $wife was like “wtf it can separate itself”.

But did Cameron deliberately left a door open at the end of Dark Fate, for a continuation of the story a la Legion? (Cameron said he closed all doors for future storylines in T2 deliberately).

I will miss Arnie as Terminator though, I think it was his last Terminator movie.

Sidenote : the logo on the van “Carl’s draperies - we will never leave you hanging” got a chuckle from me.

Not a review but instead a heads-up for an upcoming movie.

On March 19, 2021, The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent will premiere. It stars Nicholas Cage playing Nicholas Cage, who is trying to get a role in a Quentin Tarantino movie.

Everyone’s probably seen The Day After Tomorrow, where our environment is so out of whack that Mother Nature decides it’s time to do a reset and freezes the entire northern hemisphere in just days. It was playing again last night on one of the movie channels.

When I listened to the director’s commentary a couple of years ago, he said it wasn’t his intention to make a message movie about how we’re being stupid with technology and resource consumption, but audience members took it that way. It’s easy to do when there’s characters in the movie saying exactly that.

What most people miss is there’s foreshadowing in the movie that blows that idea out of the water. It comes when the students are visiting the Natural History Museum and one reads the info that says the mammoth was flash frozen with food still in its mouth.

This is an animal from thousands of years ago. There weren’t any cars back then, no man-made ozone-depleting chemicals, no humans burning fossil fuels on a large enough scale to cause global warming, and especially not enough humans to deplete Earth’s resource.

The foreshadowing in the movie means that while we have those problems now, Mother Nature’s going to do a flash freeze every so often no matter what we might do.

Yep, I remember noting that, too. Followed by my ex saying, essentially, that I was a killjoy.

Edit- not saying you’re a killjoy, just that she didn’t appreciate it in the moment.

I guess I had a kind of anti-establishment weekend, watching:
Office Space
Brazil
Idiocracy

3 Likes

One of the greatest opening scenes ever:

2 Likes

This is what I posted a month ago. I knew as soon as I learned about it the film would be very special. I underestimated it. Not because of the film by itself, but because of the addition of what it took to make the film and how it was made.

The movie is Loving Vincent, a 2017 biographical drama about the last letter Vincent van Gogh wrote being found a year after he died. Joseph Roulin, the postman who delivered the letters sent to and from Vincent and his brother Theo, asks his son Armand to deliver it to Theo. Joseph feels its only right that this last letter find its way there and doesn’t abide the difference between Vincent’s statements that he was feeling quite well and committing suicide just six weeks later.

Armand agrees, but when he tries to deliver the letter, he learns that Theo died six months after Vincent. His efforts to find the next most appropriate person to receive the letter puts Armand on a journey of learning about Vincent’s last days. Each person he talks to gives him a different point of view, some contradictory: Vincent was trouble the moment he appeared, Vincent was misunderstood. When he finally gets to talk with Dr. Gachet, the physician who treated Vincent in his last weeks, was an amateur painter himself and was present when Vincent died, Armand still doesn’t have a final answer, but decides Theo’s widow should receive the letter. Gachet delivers it and brings back a copy of one of Vincent’s earliest letters to Theo, signed, as typical, “Your loving Vincent.”
 

There are several films about Vincent van Gogh. Most were made in 1990 or later, including a TV movie called Van Gogh: Painted With Words, starring Benedict Cumberbatch. The earliest one seems to be Lust for Life with Kirk Douglas back in 1956. Vincent & Theo explores the relationship between the two brothers and how Theo struggled to show the world how talented his brother was. There’s also the very emotional episode of Doctor Who called “Vincent and the Doctor”, where The Doctor gives Vincent a chance to see the success that came only after his death.

I haven’t seen any of the dozen or so movies about van Gogh. I really liked “Vincent and the Doctor”. I don’t know if there’s been any other animated movies about him, but I do know that Loving Vincent is a unique animated movie that may never be duplicated ever again.

Why?

Because it was animated using hand-painted oil paintings.

66,960 oil paintings, for a filming rate of 12 frames a second, with each painting filmed twice to become the standard 24 frames a second movies are shown at.

 
When heard that’s how the movie was made, I thought, “They can’t use a traditional animation method of having a background painting and then overlaying a clear animation cell with the characters or whatnot.” I thought they had to paint each frame of the movie on a separate canvas and they ended up with 66,960 separate canvases when they got done. Their method was actually closer to traditional animation. Once a painting was filmed, the animators scraped away the paint at the points where it needed to change for the next frame and worked on those spots.

Traditional animation involves drawing outlines and filling the interior with color. Oil paintings usually aren’t done that way. How in the world did they learn out how to animate with an oil painting?

One part involved using computers to take the over 90 paintings selected from van Gogh’s works and figure out how to create camera movements and color changes. For example, a painting created in winter needing to be changed to summer, or from day to night.

Another part involved teaching painters to duplicate van Gogh’s style, both for his oil paintings like the famous “The Starry Night” and for black and white sketches, which were used for flashback sequences but were done as paintings, too.

Another part went back to another standard animation process of painting the keyframes, which are the frames in the movie that define a beginning and ending point of a sequence and the animators do all the adjustments in between.

Another part included building physical sets and making props that matched the selected paintings so actors could be filmed in front of a green screen, playing the parts that would later be animated on canvas.

All of that did come together in specially-constructed animation workstations that gave the painters a monitor to watch the live-action footage on as they translated that into oil paintings, then activating the camera that photographed their work before scraping away the paint and making updates. It’s a type of rotoscoping that works.

 
Five years of work, using the world’s slowest method of animation.

Worth it.

They got there by first creating a Kickstarter campaign to raise funds to train the animators. They also got funding from the Polish Film Institute. They go to a company to work with them on producing the film and are told, “We’re not an animation company”, but after seeing the concept trailer, it became “We’re now an animation company. We’re in.” And they got official help with selecting the paintings and with accuracy from the Van Gogh Museum.
 

When you buy this film, you want the 2-Disc Collector’s Edition. It is the special features on the Blu-ray disc and the documentary on the second disc called “The Impossible Dream” that build on a movie that’s special in its own right. The DVD version just doesn’t have enough to help you appreciate what it took to create Loving Vincent and for some reason it doesn’t have closed captioning. The Blu-ray does.

Until I watched the special features and the documentary, the little I remembered about Vincent van Gogh came mostly from the Doctor Who episode and the Don McLean song “Vincent”. I didn’t know that Vincent and Theo exchanged hundreds of letters, nor that Theo kept all of the ones he got from Vincent while Vincent kept very few. I didn’t know, like many of the artists who worked on this project, that Theo supported his brother both emotionally and financially, paying for everything so Vincent could just concentrate on painting, going in eight short years from a nobody to the person people now respect.

To paraphrase the song,
We are listening
We have learned how
The world is listening now.

 

“Loving Vincent” - official trailer

Official website

The making of Loving Vincent

BBC segment about the movie

1 Like

Someone’s not listening. The Parsonage Garden at Nuenen by van Gogh was stolen yesterday from the Singer Laren museum in Laren, Netherlands.

We just enjoyed watching Sunset. IT was Bruce Willis’ first movie role and it was a lot of fun. Apparently, Garner didn’t like working with him all that much; thought he wasn’t serious enough about his work. The movie was a lot of fun. Gunfights, whore houses, car chases, biplanes, horses, fistfights, murder, and intrigue.

2 Likes

I caught a good chunk of The Dark Night Rises today. Hadn’t seen it before, but what I said four years ago really stands out. Bane sets up his own version of Escape from New York, has that going for over three months, holding the city hostage with a bomb of ultimate doom.

So exactly what is Superman doing during all that time?

Yes, this is a Batman movie, but Manhattan Island is very recognizable. That means Metropolis is next door. I guess he was too busy to take a few seconds to fly across the river and give ole Batsy a hand.

Power levels and turf man. Batman called dibs.

Thor doesn’t fight Like Cage’s enemies, the Silver Surfer didn’t bother with Thanos. Marvel instead of DC, but I know more heroes in that one. Even though Kingpin is near indestructible for the Defenders, Star Lord could lay waste to everything, but there goes Hells Kitchen again.

Now, Spider-Man and Deadpool should be running into Daredevil and them on a regular basis, and I know DP and Spidey do run into each other.

I think the Nolan Batman movies are meant to be taken in a vacuum: that universe may not have a Superman.