He hadn’t worked out a deal. He was going to another county to try to get the sheriff there to protect them from arrest.
I thought your name was Tim Woodman (ba-dum-tsssh)
1 Like
Asking “please stop swearing in front of my kids” is not being “politically correct”.
But politicians have brought this on themselves. The rhetoric in recent years has gotten insane. Bachmann, Palin, McConnell, Cantor, etc., haven’t been swearing, but the things coming out of their mouths have been pretty ugly anyway.
It wasn’t such a leap to take to bring the discourse to vulgar language, and the Donald wouldn’t notice how far the leap was if it was the New Jersey Turnpike.
… and corrupt.
The pair argued listing Oak Flat as a historic place would continue to sabotage plans by Resolution Copper to begin work on its controversial mine.
Um … Just because someone wants to use it for profit doesn’t make it any less historic. Surely the whole point of having a historic place is so that people can’t use it for profit?
I’m still trying to find verification that the “former historian” actually said it wasn’t a sacred site.
Clinton is trying to walk this back (as a “misspoke”), but there are already so many people enraged over this. To me it just shows how callous and dismissive of the LGBT community she has always been (and still will be for years to come).
It goes beyond whitewashing. She deliberately built an argument extolling Nancy’s “advocacy”. It’s not a “oops, I used the wrong word”. It’s more like “oops, I got caught being an insensitive, conniving bitch.”
1 Like
That’s ok, why don’t you go run for something honey.
Because libraries are bad.
And here are the facts:
So, the call is right, or close enough at $180 a year times 20 years.The response is that it’s worth it, OK, I can swing with that.
And damn public buildings are freaking expensive.
The same group is pushing Indiana to spend our surplus on roads instead of raising taxes. I’m not a fan of that either, a surplus is not something to be spent on regular maintenance.
American’s for Prosperity are nothing if not consistent. Oddly for libertarians actually. It is a kick when people call the Koch brothers conservative though. Most establishment conservatives are against most of what they want.
No, the call misrepresented how the increase would be calculated over time. As the bond is paid off, the amount needed to pay it is reduced.
Because… taxes bad. But this is the first time that I can think of that they’ve actually pointed to something specific that they don’t want taxes to pay for.
Like Florida’s miserable failure of requiring welfare recipients to be drug tested, that Koch and ALEC wanted other states to do, even after it was proven that the program was a miserable failure and had been ruled unconstitutional?
This weekend, the Kochs are having their annual strategy meeting in the Palm Springs area, and the main item on the agenda is trying to figure out how they can decide who gets to run for the primaries, and then the most effective spending to ensure “their” candidate wins the general.
You check under the bed for the boogie man too? The Kochs have a lot less influence on the conservative right than Soros has on the left. The Kochs are for legalization of Marijuana, gay marriage, increased legal immigration, neutral on abortion, and all over the map on many things, but are pretty consistent on smaller government.
As much as I hate to link Politifact, there is no real connection here. Other companies who gave to the same organization as th Koch brothers…
Regardless, according to Hinderaker, guess who else has joined the Kochs in contributing to the State Policy Network? Among others, Microsoft, Facebook, AT&T, Time Warner Cable, and Comcast.
This is not the add conservatives in DC want to see either
.
https://www.rt.com/usa/335075-koch-bernie-sanders-ad/
I don’t agree because $180 a year over 20 years would be 3,600, they obviously accounted for some sort of reduction there. I just happen to think that maybe, if I can drop $300k on a house I can afford a new library for $180 a year. I think the add may be factually correct, but I also don’t agree with it.
Okay, I did not see that on the drug testing.
But you have to admit, the Kochs have been very involved in ALEC. And they have spent a lot of money funding groups that do not support
Remember what 1968 actually got us?
I think some of the issue here is that they give a lot of money to a lot of places, and earmark it as “money for ‘x’” when organization Y also backs other things.
I just think it’s funny that a lot of people on the left blame them for the current politics, when their more of a moderate force than a lot of people out there think they are. Just like with the Tea Party, they ignore the actual far right and start acting like these people are the far right.
But which one is the real Tea Party?
Because I can’t tell.
Unfortunately, or fortunately I suppose, they all are. Since there is no real national organization. But the base principals as laid out years ago have them almost as a constitutionalist/libertarian arm of the GOP.
I think some of the point was to have a movement that couldn’t be co-opted by big pockets, and what happened is instead of being bought, they were labelled. The media showing the rallies and cutting minorities out of the pictures and crap like that in order to paint it as an anti Obama movement. When actually more GOP establishment seats were lost than Democrat seats to Tea Party candidates. And yeah, with movements like that you end up with a few Michelle Bachmans, but we also got Mia Love out of it, so I’ll take that trade, since Michelle is already gone.
Seriously???
I’ve already had several overseas friends offer to let me stay with them if Trump is elected.
“I don’t think our supporters are inciting. What our supporters are doing is responding to a candidate who has, in fact, in many ways, encouraged violence,” he said, as quoted by CNN.
Bernie quote… If your supporters are rushing the stage, shouting out messages during speeches, and otherwise trying to block people from attending, including by snatching up tickets and not attending, then they are part of the problem. I don’t know how it’s OK in his head for people to react like this to a candidate.
I’d like to point at Trump being Darth Vader on all of this and just wash it away with his stink, it’s a bigger problem than just him. It appears as if people have decided it’s ok to respond to someone “Inciting Violence” by actually committing violence. He made me do it!!!
It’s horrible opinionated might makes right dudes, vs. your words hurt like fists lifelong victims. With a nice flavor of racists on both sides, as well as anyone else that wants to complain about anything else.
When was the last time we had multiple people charging or having to be stopped by the Secret Service from a presidential candidate.
I cannot imagine Trump Vs. Sanders in the general, they’ll issue gas masks at the door to the debate.
Protesters are voicing their opinions and their disapproval. Trump is advocating and condoning the violence. He makes jokes about it and tells his supporters that he wishes he could do it. Punch him for me. I’ll pay your lawyer bill.
There is a big difference.
Saying “well you’re asking for it” doesn’t fly.