The Weinstein Company is still alive. An investor group was working on buying it and TWC sold the rights to two movies to raise funds. Then the New York Attorney General filed a law suit to get a couple of points of that negotiation strengthened: better compensation for victims, give up the non-disclosure agreements, and better protection for employees who would still be working with the same managers as before.
TWC fires David Glasser “for cause” and the negotiation is in doubt. Glasser files counter-suit to say he’s being made a scapegoat. TWC suddenly announced they’re filing for bankruptcy, but the next day, everything’s hunky-dory and the sale is going to go through.
Meanwhile, a sculpture called “Casting Couch” has been placed not far from where the Oscars will be held this weekend. Life-size golden sculpture of Harvey Weinstein sitting on a casting couch wearing a half-open bathrobe. Sit down, take a selfie with it.
On the Garrison Keillor front, the "more information" MPR said they had is email sent between the two people, but again, they've let Garrison provide the details and it opens up a new hole in what they've been saying. He says the messages were "romatic writing" that never went beyond that to anything physical between the two people. He does acknowledge the messages were more than romantic and a bit sexual, and was stupid for him to participate in, even if the exchange of messages was mutual.
That’s the hole. MPR says part of the problem was Garrison wasn’t giving them access to his email. But they had those same messages from the woman that received them. It doesn’t sound like they were looking to corroborate her side of the story since they went ahead and took action based on her statements.
It’s still coming across as a weak attempt to justify their actions and they’re continuing to let Garrison shape public opinion about what happened. If you’ve got a strong case against someone, you don’t do that. You provide the facts up front, ahead of time, which makes any explanations by the other side appear weaker when they get around to saying them later.
“Person A did B, C, D and E, which led us to take steps F, G and H”, which is usually followed by person A making a statment like, “I acknowledge I made some missteps and I am sorry for it” or “I categorically deny those allegations”.
In contrast, MPR’s statements have been “Garrison did something bad but we won’t say what it is because we want to protect the other person’s privacy, but he has to go nonetheless” and a few months later, “There’s more to it, but we’re still not really going to says what it is”. Meanwhile, Garrison has been saying, “This is specifically what I did”, providing a stronger defence for himself.