Random Musings (and associated non sequiturs) v. 3.0

Make two batches and freeze one. Then this time can be the special occasion and the other can be a nice time.

Got this from someone on Facebook.

2016 = 666 + 666 + 666 + 6 + 6 + 6

So far I haven’t heard any notorious talking heads mentioning this.

Britain just legalised gene therapy for fertilised eggs.

The scientist from Oxford [on the radio] sounded really pleased that her research into curing inheritable diseases had a chance of actually going on to cure inheritable diseases.

The idiot that the BBC had pulled from a “I hate everything science has done since colour television” club then went on to complain loudly that obviously this was just a method of allowing wealthy parents to create “designer babies” that grew up according to their parents whims.

I feel so sorry for the poor scientist who had to boil down “that’s not how it works, you complete and utter dipshit! Do you even understand the billions of bits of data you’d have to change in order to make someone blonde as opposed to the tiny snippets of data you’d have to change to render a disease harmless? What we’re suggesting is changing some letters in a book, not changing the paper it’s printed on!” into a more radio-worthy retort: “Don’t be silly, that would be unethical.”

Oh gods, don’t give them any ideas, the idiots will start insisting that it’s a freedom-of-press issue.

I do worry about editing out some diseases. Does X happen because of Y we don’t know anything about? There are some genetic diseases that appear to be related to good things, if you eliminate the one do you eliminate the other?

Not saying we shouldn’t cure these things if we can, but I have read too much science fiction where we end up with a homogeneous uncreative population because we eliminated something in the gene pool. Or stories where we eliminate harmful insects and collapse the entire environment. But the damage isn’t seen until well after you can’t go back.

Are the people willing to do this willing to follow these families for a couple generations? This is stuff that could have ramifications that don’t show up right away. Are we changing letters in the first chapter of a book not realizing we just spelled masjhtrentjksdfnas at the end of the book when it’s supposed to say Einstein?

At a certain level, couldn’t this be said of medications (which can and do have side effects) and perhaps surgical procedures?

Not on a genetic level though. I’m assuming the genetic adjustments are passed on, which I’m not sure that they would be.

If someone has measles and you cure it, it doesn’t affect their kids, except in the sense that they now live to have them. If someone has Down’s, and you eliminate the genetic defect, does that edited gene pass on or does it “revert” in the next generation? There may be assumptions scientists are making, and I’m sure they’ve fiddled with flatworms and mice, but we’re a bit more complicated in some ways.

If the genes are edited, especially at the in vitro stage, then yes, the altered fixed genes are passed on to offspring.

Yes, there are some very good concerns. But I personally look forward to a day where horrible diseases like Wilson’s disease, juvenile diabetes, ets. are a thing of the past.

But Down’s syndrome can not be “cured” by this method. This method is about changing a few tiny gene sequences. Editing out Down’s syndrome would require the removal of an entire chromosome.

It was the first genetic disease I could think of.

Changing jobs has really messed with my insurance. I think I had 3 policies at one point. Now I’m down to 2, and should be able to trim that to 1.

Here’s a company name: McGuffin, Inc. “We put the device in plot device”

In honor of Safer Internet Day 2016, Google is giving away 2 GB of Google Drive to anyone who checks their Google Security settings. Just check the settings, that’s all you have to do.

3 Likes

Well, this is pretty cool. Congratulations, San Deigo-ers.

http://www.cw6sandiego.com/video/lost-sunken-ship-reappears-80-years-later-off-coronado/

So, I’m confused. The story indicates it sat ashore indefinitely after it crashed, but the story is saying it “reappeared” after 80 years. So which is it? Either it’s been there since it crashed or it drifted out to sea and then drifted back to shore?

It was buried under sand for all that time. With the massive beach erosion that El Nino has been wreaking on the west coast the ship was uncovered and “appeared” again.

It also “reappeared” four years ago, according to an old article I found.

So, yeah, a bit of hype from the newspapers, combined with some ignorance of local history from the residents.

I’m going to be teaching subnet masking tomorrow. Wish me luck.

Don’t forget to wave your hat, @Nabiki.

1 Like

Oh, I’m also teaching IPv4 and IPv6 tomorrow as well. This chapter will probably continue into Thursday, which means I will have to cover two chapters on a day next week.

We learned about IPv6 back in the late 90s. When is actually going to be implemented?